Thursday, June 29, 2006
Wot no trunnions?
I have been following an interesting thread on the CT Forum regarding the age old problems of the dreaded Triumph vertical link and trunnion assembly. Nearly everyone has seen, or heard of a Spitfire, Herald, etc breaking a vertical link, we get to see the results of such more than most here at the Canley workshops. Fortunately in most instances the fatigue breaks happen in low speed manoeuvers such as parking. I have never heard of one letting go whilst driving in a straight line on a motorway for instance?
Well it's not a very closely guarded secret that we had been working on a complete replacement. Several customers/freinds had pondered over the box of CNC machined rose joint carriers sat prominantly on one of my workshop benches for the last several months. The bulk of the work on the kit was done last year in conjuction with the OE (original equipment) suspension supplier to Caterham, who also happens to be a good friend of mine. So why have we not begun to market it I hear you ask? Easy, cost! The major part of the conversion, the Caterham vertical link, is still relatively expensive at nearly £70 a pop, the same price as the 'normal' Triumph link because they come from the same source, our friend who also happens to be OE supplier to Unipart for the Triumph links. Together we had been working towards a better price on the link (all links, Triumph included), so did not want to jump in with the conversion kit until this was settled. Everything else is done and on the shelf, the carriers were machined back in February for instance.
The kit dosn't end there however, we have worked on multiple up-grades, and add ons to the kit to include beefier stub axles, larger sealed bearings, new alloy hubs for those bearings/stub axles, and an economical bolt on brake up-grade, all specified and ready to go.
As I say all of this was done last year, this year we have gone back to the rear end to try and nail that CV conversion, and the bolt on disc brake conversion, and, and..........
Monday, June 19, 2006
Le Mans Spitfire laid bare
Ever wondered what the inner workings of genuine Le Mans Spitfire looks like? Well here's a one off opportunity to see one in a dismantled state. I have started to empty my garage at home of the complete project (all be it in a very dismantled state!) we had aquired over the past few years from a local source with impeccable provenance. Having been in the same ownership since it's factory racing days, it hasn't moved out of it's Midlands home for over 35 years. Complete less some of the more fragile components, the remaining bodywork is however in a parlous state. Disassembled after a major off, every panel now displays some form of damage. Worse still at some point many years ago the fragile aluminium panelwork was either shot blasted, or paint stripped, and has spent many years corroding as a result. The chassis is badly bent, and everything forward of the engine turrets has been hacked off and discarded.
For the uninitiated the factory circuit cars were unique both by the method of their construction, and the materials used in that construction. It would be next to impossible to replicate today given that virtually every part was handcrafted, or used factory tooling now long gone. Being all aluminium (apart from the fibre roof and front wings), means that to construct an all aluminium tub today would probably cost the same as a new Ferrari! Mark Field had a good go, but took the sensible/economic route and used a steel GT6 tub as the basis of his replica.
We aren't sure exactly how far we can progress the restoration of our car, it's simply a huge task being that it's been stripped down to every last nut & bolt, and every rivot has been drilled out of that precious aluminium panelwork? In the short term be aim to stabalize any corrosion and repair any damage that occurred in in it's 1960's accident so that we can carefully reassemble as much of the bodywork as possible. To that end once we have itemised, catalogued, and photograped every last component, the bulkhead/tub panels are going into our ace aluminium guys workshop for conservation, and reassembly. So take a good look this is the last time you might see this car for some time! If in the meantime you want to get up close and personnel with a part of this car then the TSSC have it's petrol tank in their museum, I'm sure they wouldn't mind you popping over for a look.
Thursday, June 15, 2006
So what were they?
Inlet opens 16 degree's BTDC, closes 56 degree's ABDC
Exhaust opens 56 degree's BBDC, closes 16 degree's ATDC
Fairly tame then! Similar to the late PI/TR6 18/58 cam, that was also not known for it's 'sportyness'.
However it makes the Stag's output look quite impressive given it's tame cams. More power and torque than the 150bhp TR6 (really 142, rounded up for good PR), from less sporting cams than the late strangulated 125 bhp PI/TR6. The Stag was quoted straight out of the box at 145bhp, and 170 lb ft. It makes you wonder what a decent set of cams alone might make to a Stag motor? I have always liked the 25/65 cams fitted across the board to late 60's early 70's Triumph's, the Vitesse, GT6, Spitfire MKIII, 2.5PI MK1 and early MKII, etc. That to me seemed to be the best compromise between power/torque/ecomomy/driveabilty, of any standard Triumph camshaft. I'm just about to start building up a Stag motor (no not a 32 valve, not yet anyway!) for our RBRR entry this year, I wonder if I can get someone to grind me up a set of cams to something with a little more 'sparkle'? I know Tony Hart got Piper to grind him a set for his modsports car a few years ago, and that and a set of quad Webers reputedly kicked out 250 horse power. I'm not after that sort of increase, after all once the RBRR is done the car will go back to the school run as the wife's plaything. It might be worth fabricating a set of headers as well, difficult to do a nice job given the constraints of the Stag engine bay, but I can't do any worse than some of the shocking efforts Iv'e seen from other specialists. We bought another Triumph V8 saloon (Rover V8) recently, and the 'performance' tubular headers under that are a sight to behold, bloody terrible!
One other thing to come to light with all of this Stag research, is that a Stag is a full 100lb heavier than a 2.5 saloon, fat b$%@£*d!
The bloke that designed/specified 6 cyl cams works here!
Tuesday, June 13, 2006
Birthday boy gets injected!
There's no problem with space in the workshop either for Jason's Vitesse as we have had a bit of a purge and finished off several customers cars recently that have now been collected. We have done more MOT's in the past month than we did over the preceeding 2 years, and we are going great guns fitting those special offer clutch's we are currently shifting. All in all busy times, and its great to be back into the swing of things in the workshop. We even have a record number of the Canley fleet on the road at the moment with 5 Triumphs in use, soon to be followed by two more, seven Triumph's on the road, I'm living the dream!